Was this site built with Framer? How to tell

Visual builder, not an AI builder · default hosting *.framer.website

Framer is a visual builder with AI features, not an AI builder: a person designs the page and the tool ships it. Our scanner treats it that way, so a Framer site is reported as "Likely AI-assisted" at most, never as AI-built on the hosting signal alone.

It identifies itself clearly, through a generator meta tag and its own asset hosts.

The verdict and the evidence are free. The improvement report needs a free account.

How to check it yourself

No tools needed
  1. Search the page source for a generator meta tag naming Framer.
  2. Look for assets loaded from framerusercontent.com.
  3. Check the address: published projects live on *.framer.website until a custom domain is attached.

What the scanner looks for

3 live rules

These are the rules enabled in the database right now, with the weight each one carries. A single strong match is enough to name the builder; the weights decide how confident the verdict is.

RuleWhere it looksWhat it matchesWeight
Framer generator meta tagthe generator meta tagframer95
Framer hosting domainthe site address(^|\.)framer\.(website|app|ai)$90
Framer asset hostthe host a script is loaded from(^|\.)framerusercontent\.com$|(^|\.)framer\.com$85

What Framer sites usually get wrong

Heavy pages

Design-first pages ship large images and fonts. On a phone that is the difference between a site that feels instant and one that does not.

Text baked into images

Anything that is part of an image cannot be read by a search engine or a screen reader.

Questions

Why is Framer not reported as AI-built?

Because a Framer site is the output of a person using a design tool. Reporting it as machine-generated would be wrong, so a Framer fingerprint alone never produces that verdict.


Other builders