Find out if any website was built
with an AI website builder
Detects sites built with
every major builder
Lovable
v0
Bolt
Replit
Base44
Framer
Webflow
Wix
Squarespace
Durable
Names and logos are trademarks of their owners, shown to say which builders this scanner recognises.
How it works
No language model is asked for an opinion. Every point of confidence traces back to a named rule and the exact value it matched, shown in a table you can check yourself.
The page, its robots.txt and sitemap, and the site's own JavaScript bundles are downloaded by our server. Nothing on the target runs.
Generator tags, script hosts, hosting domains, badges, bundle markers, code hygiene, metadata and placeholder copy, each with a weight.
A verdict with its confidence, the evidence behind it, and a prioritised report: what is wrong, what it costs, and the exact change to make.
| Family | Weight | What it looks at |
|---|---|---|
| Builder fingerprints | 50% | generator meta tags, known script hosts, JS bundle markers, deployment headers, platform badges, hosting domains |
| Code hygiene | 25% | default class vocabulary left unrenamed, data-testid attributes, deeply nested wrappers, huge utility class strings |
| Metadata quality | 15% | missing canonical, missing or default Open Graph tags, default project titles left in place, absent JSON-LD |
| Content signals | 10% | filler body text, placeholder brand names, untouched default hero copy, placeholder contact details |
A direct AI-builder fingerprint is conclusive on its own. Without one, the signals must total 55 points before a site is called AI-assisted. Full method.
| Domain | Verdict | Conf. | Builder | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| trustwayequitysolutions.com | No AI builder | 8% | - | 1d ago |
| linden-butjer.de | No AI builder | 3% | - | 1d ago |
| sliderworks.com | No AI builder | 3% | WordPress | 2d ago |
| axiobyte.online | No AI builder | 19% | - | 2d ago |
| qckinetixgreenville.com | AI-built | 85% | Lovable | 2d ago |
| www.albedoedu.com | No AI builder | 18% | - | 2d ago |
| yeremisb.com | No AI builder | 0% | - | 2d ago |
| synapticsci.com | No AI builder | 0% | - | 3d ago |
Every scan produces a prioritised list of concrete fixes. Each names the issue, its severity, what it costs the business in plain language, and the exact change to make.
| Audit | Covers |
|---|---|
| SEO | title length, meta description, canonical, Open Graph, Twitter cards, JSON-LD, heading hierarchy, robots.txt, sitemap, client-side-only rendering |
| Performance | page weight, unoptimised and unsized images, render-blocking scripts, missing lazy loading, compression, caching |
| Security | CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, Referrer-Policy, cookie flags |
| Accessibility | missing alt text, contrast failures, form labels, tap target size, zoom blocking |
| AI-builder risk | API keys in the client bundle, public Supabase anon keys without RLS, unprotected endpoints, leftover defaults |
Plans
Every scan shows the verdict, the confidence and the full evidence table. The first 3 fixes come with it; the rest of the report needs a free account.
scans a day from one connection, with the verdict and the evidence behind it. Results are cached for 24 hours, and re-checking a cached URL does not count.
scans a day, the full improvement report with a shareable link, a saved history and a confidence chart for every URL you re-scan. Create an account.